Bridge 09/02/2008

| | Comments (0)
Bridge

Rachel joined us for bridge tonight and was my partner. She did pretty well considering that she was new to bridge (or, at least, her handicap was higher than we started with).

The date is 09/02/2008

The players are:

North East South West
MarkH Nick/JohnH Rachel Wayne
8
A 9 4 2
A Q 9 8 6
9 8 2
5 4 2

N

W         E

S

A K 9 6 3
K Q 10 7 5 J 3
J 7 10 3 2
Q 7 3 K J 5
Q J 10 7
8 6
K 5 4
A 10 6 4

Bidding was as follows:

South West North East
pass pass pass 1♠
pass 2♠ pass pass

A 8 was then led.

The score turned out to be -1

The IMP turned out to be -2


10 2
A 8 7 5 4
A 8
A J 9 5
9 5 3

N

W         E

S

A 8
Q J 9 3 2 K 10
Q 5 3 K 9 7 6 4 2
7 2 10 4 3
K Q J 7 6 4
6
J 10
K Q 8 6

Bidding was as follows:

West North East South
pass pass pass 1♠
pass 2 3 3♠

A 3 was then led.

The score turned out to be 5

The IMP turned out to be 4

I actually missed an Ace during my first bid. Oops. I would have bid 1 if I would have seen it originally. But, wait, that's not all. When Rachel bids 1♠, I think "jump to new suit" but say the next valid heart level. Apparently, it is both a jump and a shift.


A Q 8 6 4 2
8
K 8 6
Q 7 5
10 7 5

N

W         E

S

9
K 6 5 4 Q 10 9 7 3
4 Q 10 9 7 5 3
K 10 9 6 3 4
K J 3
A J 2
A J 2
A J 8 2

Bidding was as follows:

North East South West
2♠ pass 4nt pass
5 pass 6♠ pass

A Q was then led.

The score turned out to be 1

The IMP turned out to be 9

My first big hand and I mess it up. The Spades were not split evenly and I did not draw the last one out. That proved to be my downfall when I played a Diamond. Oh, and by the way, I had rule of twenty here but went for the 6-card length bid. Not that it mattered, 4NT was the response either way.


9 7 5
10 8
Q 5 3
Q 9 7 6 2
J 8 6 2

N

W         E

S

Q 10 4
A K Q J 5 3
A J K 9 8 7 2
K 10 8 A 4 3
A K 3
9 7 6 4 2
10 6 4
J 5

Bidding was as follows:

East South West North
pass pass 1nt pass
2nt pass 3nt pass

A 6♣ was then led.

The score turned out to be 4

The IMP turned out to be 5


K Q 8 3 2
K
K J 10 7 6 5
10
10 5

N

W         E

S

9 7 6
J 10 A 9 6 5 4 3
3 2 A 9 4
Q J 9 8 7 5 4 K
A J 4
Q 8 7 2
Q 8
A 6 3 2

Bidding was as follows:

South West North East
1♣ 3♣ 3 3
double pass pass pass

A Q was then led.

The score turned out to be -4

The IMP turned out to be 13


6
J 6 3
J 8 5 3 2
K J 10 2
K J 9 5 2

N

W         E

S

A Q 10
9 4 2 K 7
10 Q 9 7
A Q 8 3 9 7 6 5 4
8 7 4 3
A Q 10 8 5
A K 6 4

Bidding was as follows:

South West North East
1 pass pass pass
pass 1♠ 2 2♠

A 3 was then led.

The score turned out to be -2

The IMP turned out to be -5


10 8 6 4 3 2
A J 10 4 2
K
Q
A 7 5

N

W         E

S

K
K Q 9 6 5 8 7
6 4 2 A 9 8 7 3
10 8 A J 9 6 2
Q J 9
3
Q J 10 5
K 7 5 4 3

Bidding was as follows:

North East South West
2♠ 3♣ pass 3
double pass pass pass

A K was then led.

The score turned out to be -2

I did not notice that I qualified for a rule of 20 here. But, even if I did, I still would bid the 6-card suite length. Which apparently pissed some people off.

Categories

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mark Hamzy published on September 2, 2008 9:24 PM.

Game Day 09/01/08 was the previous entry in this blog.

Game Day 09/04/08 is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0